News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by divbzero on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:27PM (#33167081)
Does anyone know if we are facing similar ecological collapse on land?
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by makerofspoons on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:37PM (#33167267)
Yes, unfortunately: More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...

48% of bird species in decline: https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/05/global-bird-populat...

among other examples. In 2018 it was estimated by the WWF that 60% of the animal population was lost between 1970 and 2014: https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/living-planet-report-2018

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by colechristensen on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:35PM (#33167246)
We don’t eat land predators, generally, and most of the biomass lots happened much earlier with the spread of humans, i.e. 500 to 20,000 years ago.

Most of the worlds land megafauna are gone because big slow things are really easy to kill for groups of primitive humans with pointy sticks.

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by chucksta on Thursday October 13, 2022 @09:21AM (#33190595)
There are certainly more recent records.. https://www.businessinsider.com/skulls-photo-american-bison-...

>In 1800, it was estimated there were forty million bison, by 1883, there were few wild bison in the United States - most were in Yellowstone National Park. By 1900, there were less than a thousand left in North America.

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by vkou on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:33PM (#33167213)
We've already caused it. The overwhelming majority of land mammal mass is either humans, or farm animals raised for humans to eat. Almost half of the world's land surface is now farmland.
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by ThrowawayIP on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:38PM (#33167284)
And the vast vast majority of this farmland that could be used to raise human-edible crops is used to feed domesticated animals. While humans die of starvation.
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by colechristensen on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:38PM (#33167288)
> Almost half of the world's land surface is now farmland

This is a BS statistic meant to shock and inappropriately counts the entire area of wilderness that might be used for grazing which is just wilderness that would have supported similar animals anyway.

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by vkou on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:50PM (#33167485)
Managed crop monoculture, which ~half of farmland is - is not 'something similar' to natural forests, plains, grasslands, scrubland, etc.

Even grazing land rarely looks anything like it does before we've shaped it for our use. And even when it does, at first glance, it gets a monoculture of animals, instead. Farmers are not keen on seeing their herds deal with competition or predation from the wild.

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by randomdata on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @03:08PM (#33167758)
> Managed crop monoculture, which ~half of farmland is

That doesn't seem right. According to the FAO (United Nations), only 1.3 billion hectares of land are arable while nearly 5 billion hectares are used for agriculture. That's more like ~25%. And the latter figure only accounts for 38% of the world's land area, so the earlier half figure claim doesn't seem right either.

I suppose if the margin of error on those approximations is exceptionally large...

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by PeterisP on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @03:00PM (#33167639)
On the other hand, we have local biodiversity regulations which require certain land to be grazed and/or cut (as for hay), since the 'meadow' biomes and the associated birds and insects have adapted to the many centuries of land being farmed and can't survive if the plains aren't grazed and are left to just grow.
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by divbzero on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:45PM (#33167398)
That fits the estimates from one research article: [1]

  0.06  Gt C human biomass
  0.1   Gt C livestock biomass
  0.007 Gt C wild mammal biomass
  0.002 Gt C wild bird biomass
The article also estimated that “wild land mammal biomass decreased ≈7.6-fold” when comparing the world today to prehuman times [2].

[1]: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1711842115

[2]: https://github.com/milo-lab/biomass_distribution/blob/master...

Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by blakesley on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:51PM (#33167492)
Err, what? You're not aware that we're destroying the planet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
Re:That Snapper You’re Eating Might Be 80 Years Old by moistly on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @08:38PM (#33171192)
It absolutely boggles my mind that people can be unaware that this world is collapsing. One would have to deliberately avoid the media. Or, I guess, just shut the information out. “Too scary to think about” might be quite literal.