Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by wavefunction on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:14AM
(#33164333)
Any examples? Their blog post on the dating economy being skewed away from black women seemed to match with economic and social realities.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by bragh on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:19AM
(#33164396)
They do have memory-holed some very inconvenient blog posts, such as this https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ (probably exists somewhere on archive.org)
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by flutas on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:23AM
(#33164443)
> (probably exists somewhere on archive.org)
Yep!
https://web.archive.org/web/20091121080804/http://blog.okcup...
God I love archive.org
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by dorfsmay on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @12:14PM
(#33165202)
Me too. Please remember they are funded and can exist only through donations@
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by lmm on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @08:59PM
(#33171382)
I loved them when I trusted them to keep backups of things that were taken down like this, but the fact that they quickly removed KiwiFarms from their archive has dented my confidence a lot.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by anon23anon on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:24AM
(#33164462)
I was a regular reader of their blog. It was great. They had a bunch of data on how we data and they weren't afraid to let the data speak. This resulted in some ppl getting upset b/c they had to hear something that didn't fit their worldview.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by afavour on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:29AM
(#33164523)
They've memory-holed (i.e. deleted) their entire old blog, no? It's disappointing but I think it's a stretch to describe that as Orwellian (as the OP did). At some point they just discarded all their old content, it's not that much of a conspiracy.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by WalterSear on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @11:37AM
(#33164654)
Old content - that it still being discussed and would still be generating pageviews.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by afavour on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @12:02PM
(#33165023)
Entirely possible they don't care for the page views. Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending it, I think it's a shame that interesting content like that gets pulled down but it's usually for boring corporate reasons (don't want to maintain the blog any more, they don't benefit from the pageviews) than conspiratorial Orwellian reasons.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by thatguy0900 on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @01:10PM
(#33165913)
I don't think it's a orwellian conspiracy, they make money running a dating website and took down some old blogs that suggested online dating is really pretty rigged not in your favor for guys (their paying customers). You don't need some men in the shadows to explain why they took that down
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010)
by floor2 on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @12:04PM
(#33165066)
The motivation is what matters for the folks calling it Orwellian.
If someone is deleting their posts because the facts don't align to the worldview of a religion, a political party, a corporation or some other powerful group, many people will be more concerned about that than if the posts had been deleted for more routine, functional business reasons.