Re:An everything app is terrible for liberal democracy
by loceng on Monday October 10, 2022 @02:40PM
(#33154982)
Indeed, it's difficult to easily imagine a platform that requires enough complexity to facilitate a relatively free market ecosystem where third-parties voluntarily integrate in reciprocal relationship; it's not straight-forward, not obvious, perhaps will be obvious in hindsight once the working model is clearly defined.
Re: "FB wasn't first-to-market"
What platform then first connected close peer groups via requiring a university/college email address for login, for the platform to then quickly associated those users with each other relevancy wise - leading to the network effects that quickly launched Facebook?
(Zuckerberg knowing that there only needed to be one such platform, why he lied to/misled the ConnectU twins who were actively paying him to develop ConnectU - to which he launched TheFacebook first to get an advantage)
Re:An everything app is terrible for liberal democracy
by herbst on Monday October 10, 2022 @03:07PM
(#33155270)
Long before Facebook, even before MySpace became huge our small national social network (actually a SMS and logo site that exploded) allowed you to choose a school and show you other people from that school that you could filter by age. Everyone below 20 was using it.
More or less the same thing
Re:An everything app is terrible for liberal democracy
by GoblinSlayer on Monday October 10, 2022 @04:21PM
(#33155990)
Examples of multiprotocol applications are seamonkey, pidgin, miranda, but they use open protocols and purely clients.
Anyway, most people fled Facebook because they didn't want a single identity linked to every kind of thing they post. That's why the alternatives keep their users even when they are owned by Facebook.
Also, FB wasn't first-to-market.