News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Zig-style generics are not well-suited for most languages. Parent comment

Re:Zig-style generics are not well-suited for most languages by pjmlp on Monday October 10, 2022 @02:01AM (#33148264)
Unfortunately C++20 only gave us concepts light, however Circle might be getting full concepts as they were originally designed, and those are like Rust, Go, Haskell, etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Zig-style generics are not well-suited for most languages by thechao on Monday October 10, 2022 @09:09AM (#33150889)
There's a core contingent of ISO members who don't like (don't understand?) `concept_map`; without late (and layered) binding of types to concepts you're really just rolling out a template prediction scheme.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Zig-style generics are not well-suited for most languages by pjmlp on Monday October 10, 2022 @09:12AM (#33150924)
I mainly use C++ on side projects and native library bindings, somehow I think ISO will need to change their ways if they want people to still care about anything past ISO C++23 for green field projects.
[ Parent | on HN ]