You told me human endeavors in which "diversity" (which again, means nothing) fosters innovation. But that wasn't my question. I asked what kind of diversity fosters innovation, not what kind of innovation is fostered by diversity

In some grim scenarios, diversity led to certain situations that gave rise to big innovations.

I have the strong suspicion this is a GPT-3 bot response :/

GPT?? That is the shallowest of a dismissal I've seen on HN.

I'm talking about the diversity of WW2 era Germany bringing, through great atrocity, a means for the world to not starve via nitrogen sequestration derived by the tragedies of the holocaust and the Haber Method.

It is not the prettiest example, but it fits what you've asked for.

- There was diversity

- As a result, there was innovation.

This disregards a LOT of bad things that came from this, and it doesn't validate or excuse those bad things, however it fits the stipulations of what you outlined: a time where diversity created innovation.

I already told you this is not what I asked. Your replies are all over the place and I sincerely am not understanding them.

[EDIT] wow, you edited your whole long form reply and just replaced it with "I'm not a bot"? That's such a misleading and dishonest thing to do for everyone reading these posts from now onwards