News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam... by tyfon on Sunday October 09, 2022 @09:11AM (#33140651)
In Norwegian civil court, the loser pays the legal bills for both. It may seem a bit harsh, but it does prevent frivolous law suits.

For work related cases, if you are in a union, they will foot the bill in most cases.

Re:Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam... by trevvr on Sunday October 09, 2022 @10:32AM (#33141502)
I wonder if this makes court cases a pretty high stakes game for even the smallest of issues? Interesting concept all the same.
Re:Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam... by Ekaros on Sunday October 09, 2022 @11:04AM (#33141873)
At least in Finland it still makes things quite ugly from cost perspective. It is not uncommon to read about cases where costs are in tens of thousand for real-estate. Probably one of the more common things to take in court.
Re:Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam... by denton-scratch on Sunday October 09, 2022 @01:20PM (#33143235)
> I wonder if this makes court cases a pretty high stakes game

Stay away from courts! If your case goes before a judge, you're in casino country. Unless you're on the hook for some criminal offence, tell your lawyer to negotiate a settlement. Once a civil case comes before a judge, that usually means that there's a legal issue to be decided that nobody agrees on, which means that you can't predict how the cookie might crumble.

Re:Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam... by Tor3 on Sunday October 09, 2022 @11:16AM (#33142015)
The loser doesn't always pay for both. In some cases (well, many actually), or at least in cases where party A sues party B and loses, the court decides that it wasn't all clear-cut and party A was right to get a resolution through the court system. In that case both may end up paying their respective legal bills.