News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cassandra at Apple: 1000s of Clusters, 300k Nodes, 100 PB. Parent comment

Re:Cassandra at Apple: 1000s of Clusters, 300k Nodes, 100 PB by curiousDog on Saturday October 08, 2022 @08:39PM (#33137358)
And not to mention, for 90% of the use cases out there Postgres or MySql on aurora or whatever will be more than enough
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra at Apple: 1000s of Clusters, 300k Nodes, 100 PB by JensRantil on Sunday October 09, 2022 @04:28AM (#33139108)
More like 99,9% of use cases. But yeah.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra at Apple: 1000s of Clusters, 300k Nodes, 100 PB by scarface74 on Sunday October 09, 2022 @05:54AM (#33139499)
If I know what my access patterns are, DynamoDB is often the better choice.
[ Parent | on HN ]