News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signal is secure, as proven by hackers by onetimeusename on Friday October 07, 2022 @01:39PM (#33124544)
I really dislike that about the app too. In fairness, I think the goal was to replace Apple Message and SMS which require a phone number but it is also self defeating in a sense because it breaks the privacy and plausible deniability Signal is supposed to offer by tying an app instance to a particular piece of hardware.

Almost every communication app requires a phone number now. The claim is that this limits spam which is probably true but I suspect there is tremendous value in having real phone numbers and the ability to do pervasive tracking. We know mobile phone providers sell data on phones. The best that can be said about the Signal org is they are non profit but this is not very reassuring especially given the threat model of people who might be using Signal.

Re:Signal is secure, as proven by hackers by palata on Friday October 07, 2022 @08:15PM (#33128558)
Half of the world phone numbers have leaked already (including with a Facebook leak a few years ago).

But that's not what's valuable. What's valuable is the social graph: who are your contacts, and who are you writing to. Signal works very hard to not know any of that. And it does it better than the alternatives I know.