Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough

Re:Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough by someotherpersom on Thursday October 06, 2022 @10:49PM (#33116877)

I’m afraid you are comically wrong here and misleading the public (perhaps you’re delusional). Maybe next time you should try to find some clear information https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-authorize-new...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough by drewrv on Friday October 07, 2022 @01:02AM (#33117624)

If your claim is that "the vaccine" was only tested on mice and you don't clarify that you're only talking about the updated variant, not the original, then you're being purposefully misleading.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough by aliswe on Friday October 07, 2022 @01:29AM (#33117764)

Uh ... Im pro vax, and vaxxed, but this is pretty shocking. Take a look from the other side for a second.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough by dekhn on Friday October 07, 2022 @10:26AM (#33121795)

Sorry, no, it's completely accurate to say the new FDA boosters weren't tested on humans. Period. I'm not complaining that this happened (deliberate tradeoff) but it definitely did occur and people saying that are not necessarily being misleading.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter suspends account of Dr. Peter McCullough by drewrv on Friday October 07, 2022 @11:54AM (#33123016)

Yes I agree that it's accurate to say "the new FDA boosters weren't tested on humans"!

My point is that if you leave out "the new FDA boosters" then you're being misleading. It's important context.

[ Parent | on HN ]