Re:The deception of “buying” digital movies
by jacobr1 on Tuesday October 04, 2022 @03:15PM
(#33085314)
No, I think the OP is suggesting that the more likely scenario is some professional-class "weekend-warrior" type bought the F150s with the 72m loan, which later on was resold to the working-class construction worker on the secondary market.
Re:The deception of “buying” digital movies
by phpthrowaway99 on Tuesday October 04, 2022 @03:29PM
(#33085501)
I suppose. Even lemon laws are funny if you follow them to their conclusion, so maybe OP is right.
Once a vehicle gets lemon lawed, it gets sent to auction where it is disclosed to dealers, and then it's just sold again to the public as a used car without the ability to be lemon lawed at that point.
Re:The deception of “buying” digital movies
by Retric on Tuesday October 04, 2022 @04:41PM
(#33086484)
Sold yes, but also marked as a lemon. https://www.lemonlawlawyerscalifornia.com/2022/08/how-to-kno...
There is nothing wrong with buying a lemon car at a sufficient discount.
Re:The deception of “buying” digital movies
by jacobr1 on Tuesday October 04, 2022 @03:37PM
(#33085595)
There are some laws around maintaining the history the car. Sales must be recorded, certain accidents. I think certain types of flood damage. Getting a carfax is a must if you are buying a used car.
Re:The deception of “buying” digital movies
by fragmede on Friday October 07, 2022 @05:53PM
(#33127331)
I mean, yeah I would call someone in a brand new $75k vehicle wealthy, even if they did take financing to afford it. Especially if they took dealer financing. Who buys new and who can qualify for a loan like that these days? But if you’re talking a $15k used model and taking financing on that, that’s a different story.
Unless we're calling construction workers buying F150s with 72 month loans wealthy these days.