News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Privacy”.com–Yeah Right by solumos on Monday October 03, 2022 @11:54AM (#33069260)
> what KYC is really necessary for a company like this? If I understand correctly, all they do is pass through transactions.

Products like this are particularly susceptible to fraud, especially given that they're charging your bank account directly. Without any KYC, if I as a fraudster get access to your bank login, I can basically drain your account. That opens up a ton of liability to Privacy. Also, the card networks tends to be pretty risk-averse with allowing issuing products access to their networks if there's a lot of fraud going through their services.

So, it's much easier to put KYC in place in order to avoid the headache of dealing with fraud/AML/etc

Re:“Privacy”.com–Yeah Right by public_defender on Monday October 03, 2022 @11:57AM (#33069297)
Ok yes, I can see that they would want to have some insulation from having banks charge them back on whole user accounts. That makes sense.