Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ...
by shapefrog on Monday October 03, 2022 @09:51AM
(#33067494)
Whistleblower awards can range from 10 to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ...
by nradov on Monday October 03, 2022 @10:16AM
(#33067857)
Pretty sure the whistle has already been blown on this one. But it's always better to be treated as a cooperating witness with an immunity agreement rather than as an indicted co-conspirator. (The SEC can't bring criminal charges, but they do pass on any evidence of criminal activity to the Justice Department.)
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ...
by Nextgrid on Monday October 03, 2022 @01:31PM
(#33070825)
Seems like there's cash to be made here - find a bullshit blockchain project (not too difficult - finding the opposite is the difficult bit), collect evidence, resign at the first sign of criminal activity, blow the whistle and enjoy a share of the resulting fine.
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ...
by r00fus on Monday October 03, 2022 @06:10PM
(#33074400)
This would be a great "natural selector criteria" that whittles down whatever's left of crypto scammers.
Another possible benefit is the cost of doing business (by taking valid precautions) for those scammers going up.