News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by shapefrog on Monday October 03, 2022 @09:51AM (#33067494)
Whistleblower awards can range from 10 to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by nradov on Monday October 03, 2022 @10:16AM (#33067857)
Pretty sure the whistle has already been blown on this one. But it's always better to be treated as a cooperating witness with an immunity agreement rather than as an indicted co-conspirator. (The SEC can't bring criminal charges, but they do pass on any evidence of criminal activity to the Justice Department.)
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by Nextgrid on Monday October 03, 2022 @01:31PM (#33070825)
Seems like there's cash to be made here - find a bullshit blockchain project (not too difficult - finding the opposite is the difficult bit), collect evidence, resign at the first sign of criminal activity, blow the whistle and enjoy a share of the resulting fine.
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by r00fus on Monday October 03, 2022 @06:10PM (#33074400)
This would be a great "natural selector criteria" that whittles down whatever's left of crypto scammers.

Another possible benefit is the cost of doing business (by taking valid precautions) for those scammers going up.