News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by areoform on Monday October 03, 2022 @08:57AM (#33066827)
This comment is tongue in cheek, but it's not meant to be pithy nor sarcastic — I mean this with sincerity.

Let me be the first to extend my heartfelt congratulations. You avoided the inevitable SEC enforcement action and DoJ indictment!

Thanks to your skill, moral backbone and foresight you're not spending $900/hr/head on a cadre of lawyers. That's better than how most people fare in such a scenario. So, congratulations!

However, you still need to maintain OPSEC and STFU. You've already said things in other comments that aren't the wisest things to say. I would stop right now and call a very good lawyer.

If you don't know how to find one, then call a few and ask whom they'd recommend. Zero in on the choice from there. I sincerely hope that you won't disclose any further details here or elsewhere. Especially in writing.

And remember, DON'T TALK TO THE POLICE (without a great lawyer present), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by prvit on Monday October 03, 2022 @10:13AM (#33067808)
> You avoided the inevitable SEC indictment!

The SEC does not indict people.

And FWIW, Kim Kardashian seems to be the only person to be charged here.

Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by areoform on Monday October 03, 2022 @10:22AM (#33067915)
Great catch! Fixed.

The article says that she copped to the fine and is now cooperating with their investigation?

Re:SEC charges Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting crypto ... by 58x14 on Monday October 03, 2022 @09:15AM (#33067068)
Good advice and classic video.