Re:Emacs-like editors written in Common Lisp
by nonrandomstring on Sunday October 02, 2022 @08:19AM
(#33055267)
For better or worse I think e-lisp is here to stay, with all its
quirks. I think of it as "text processing Lisp", much as I think Perl
is still a useful go-to for practical extraction and reporting. The
world of other Lisps is rich and bountiful. I'm a secret Schemer
myself and love Racket, but I'm not sure emacs needs re-writing in
fresher dialects. What's the main case, does anyone know? It might be
nice if e-lisp still had room to mature and incorporate some lessons
from younger Lisps.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.