News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Recon and Attack Vectors from My Logs by hsbauauvhabzb on Sunday October 02, 2022 @07:32AM (#33055000)
This, I’d rather not use a waf and focus on making sure that application security is good.

A waf is at best as good as AV, good as a catch all, but it won’t catch highly targeted stuff, and isn’t even a defensible boundary to protect the former.

Re:Recon and Attack Vectors from My Logs by brodock on Sunday October 02, 2022 @10:28AM (#33056137)
WAF is mandatory in some certifications.
Re:Recon and Attack Vectors from My Logs by hsbauauvhabzb on Sunday October 02, 2022 @06:07PM (#33060799)
Yes but so safe lots of silly controls.

The best part of a waf is the ability to add custom rules at runtime which can assist in blocking known vulnerabilities until they are remediated correctly.

I don’t think generic sql or XSS injection rules are at all effective not stop many real world attacks. I’ve also seen wafs create both an availability failure point, dos choke point, and be the most vulnerable product in the tool chain (see F5 code exec vulns).

Re:Recon and Attack Vectors from My Logs by chrisshroba on Sunday October 02, 2022 @08:05AM (#33055182)
What does AV mean in this context?
Re:Recon and Attack Vectors from My Logs by ShowalkKama on Sunday October 02, 2022 @08:10AM (#33055211)
antivirus