Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part II...
by donmaq on Friday September 30, 2022 @07:49PM
(#33042200)
And how can we just ignore the waste problem? [1]
In many cases, containment pools are full to the brim with spent rods [2], which is both environmentally hazardous, & a target for terrorists (dirty bombs)
1: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/nuclear-waste
2: https://ips-dc.org/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reduci...
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part II...
by pfdietz on Friday September 30, 2022 @10:35PM
(#33043256)
We can ignore the waste problem because nuclear fails even if we do so.
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part II...
by Schroedingersat on Friday September 30, 2022 @11:29PM
(#33043585)
The waste problem is real, and if the nuclear shills can demonstrate that there can exist a nuclear reactor that can compete with solar+storage in winter at 45 degrees north economically then we can bother talking about it.
Until then we dismiss them along with every other technology that does not meaningfully exist.
But nuclear at any cost is not a reasonable goal. The only reason we want nuclear is for its carbon-free energy. At which point it must be evaluated on its merits, not as an end goal of its own