We have constantly gotten better and better tech, and yet our consumption of resources only goes up. It seems that resource usage has nothing to do with how efficient or advanced our tech is, but simply the maximum amount of human labor we can allocate to resource extracting.
So climate change can only really be solved by a lower population.
A phenomenon known as Jevons paradox.
That doesn't seem to be true in terms of C02 output
https://www.google.com/search?q=us+carbon+emissions+per+capi...
It sounds like Nazi slogan.
Blaming billionaires and corporations from brand new iPhone on networks made by big-tech sounds ironical indeed.
https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/apple-reportedly-wont-b...
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/09/29/google-to-shut-gaming-se...
Every year we want bigger and bigger cars, particularly in the West, but it's a global long term trend. If you compare pretty much any 2022 vs 2002 model vehicle, say the Honda Accord, you're going to be shocked by the increase in physical dimensions.
How is that not incredibly hypocritical to want ever larger cars (mostly SUVs and trucks now) and yet point fingers at the companies we work for for their poor ESG funding and goals? We aren't even willing to accept cars that remain the same dimensions. They literally have to be bigger. That's despite average family sizes gradually declining for many decades. Climate change matters.. but not enough to give up the chance for a larger car next time.
Bigger vehicles means more materials (plastics, metals, etc), weight that could have been shaved, worse fuel/battery efficiency, and it wouldn't surprise me if it requires signifantly more asphalt and road repairs over time to accommodate the vehicles.
I could keep going about how obsessed we are with more and more horsepower and with lower 0-60 mph times, all of which are extremely excessive wants in the face of climate change.