While my example gas nothing to do with the internet it might still be interesting.
When I grew up nudism wasn't uncommon in the GDR, but after being unified with western Germany not one generation later it is more than fringe.
We only see unified filtered body types and the normality of seeing many different bodies in a non sexual way. While on the other hand even non nude bodies on Instagram often are sexualized beyond belief to maximize engagement.
We denormalized nudity, the regular body but commoditized the stereotypical filtered body.
[1] is a decent documentary about the weird and inconsistent standards applied by the MPAA. But yeah, violence is fine, man-focused sex is passable, woman-focused sex is bad, homosexual sex is RIGHT OUT, etc.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Film_Is_Not_Yet_Rated
But, it’s worth realizing the two categories are different, and they are regulated differently (either legally or socially) for good reasons.
Sexual images have a propensity to make you horny.
Violent images do not have propensity to make you violent. At least not as acutely.
As an aside, it turns out my phone dictionary does not contain the word "nudity".