News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Five Walled Gardens: Operating systems are holding browse... by altairprime on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @03:34PM (#33012206)
The other browser engines have other security CVEs. Switching engines on the backend does not materially reduce the total attack surface for vulnerabilities for any given everyday user. Using security vulnerabilities as a primary condition of existence also leads to the introduction of engine oversight, review, and adamant “update or be removed” policy enforcement upon third parties, all of which who will complain endlessly in the press about the draconian App Store policies they would be subject to. I expect a better case will need to be made to convince Apple.
Re:Five Walled Gardens: Operating systems are holding browse... by afavour on Thursday September 29, 2022 @11:08AM (#33021774)
You asked:

> What benefits to their users result from that choice?

But now we've gotten to

> I expect a better case will need to be made to convince Apple

Those aren't nearly the same things. Of course it's difficult to convince Apple, it isn't in their interests.

Re:Five Walled Gardens: Operating systems are holding browse... by altairprime on Thursday September 29, 2022 @02:23PM (#33025027)
You make the case that it’s to the benefit of their users to allow multiple browser engines. I am personally not convinced by your case, for the reasons stated above. I do not expect Apple to be convinced by your case either.

You may choose here to strengthen your argument, but your declaration that it’s hopeless to do so is of no help in that regard. If you wish to continue, I’m willing to listen.