Provide counter-arguments, sources and materials that can help educate the people you think are wrong in their analysis and research
I do my best to document and source my claims, and you know that since you checked my past comments, i do my homework
And no i'm not pro-russian, it's called impartiality
2. The United States is already at max capacity for its export capabilities. There is no incremental supply to satisfy demand.
3. Destroying foreign supply when demand can't be met only serves to destroy demand because it forces the market to move to alternatives (case in point: OPEC and how they try to not let oil prices get too high or low).
It's ludicrous to suggest the US has a significant economic interest in executing some sort of industrial sabotage on NS1/2.
Your link doesn't support your claim that this is economically motivated.
"If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the -- the border of Ukraine again, then there will be -- there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2,"
Even if it were a threat to destroy the pipeline if Russia invaded, Russia invaded. So now what would you expect to happen?
Please. If Russia wanted to keep selling gas to the EU they could have, you know, stopped invading Ukraine.
Also, comment history is nearly 100% pro-Russian talking points.