News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Have you experienced “hiring fraud?” by Nextgrid on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @01:06PM (#32998101)
> it shows that the company fundamentally doesn't trust remote workers

There's a difference between trusting remote employees and aspiring employees.

I wouldn't hold it against the company if they want to do proper due diligence on a prospective employee especially given real-world accounts of such frauds occurring.

Re:Ask HN: Have you experienced “hiring fraud?” by Goronmon on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @01:28PM (#32998397)
There's a difference between trusting remote employees and aspiring employees.

Why should an aspiring employee trust that a company is going to allow 100% remote if the first thing the company expects you to do is to travel into the office?

Re:Ask HN: Have you experienced “hiring fraud?” by ghaff on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @01:44PM (#32998583)
Fully remote does not necessarily mean zero travel and very often doesn’t.
Re:Ask HN: Have you experienced “hiring fraud?” by nottorp on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @06:43PM (#33002086)
Then it's not fully remote.
Re:Ask HN: Have you experienced “hiring fraud?” by lmm on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @08:20PM (#33002870)
adverb: fully

1. completely or entirely

It absolutely does mean zero travel.