Go runtime: 4 years later

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by baby on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @03:37AM (#32992501)

That’s probably because you’re not used to it. I think it’s common knowledge that Golang is easy to read.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by lsaferite on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @11:18AM (#32996446)

Couldn't the same be said of rust though? The biggest barrier, in my experience, is almost always familiarity with the syntax.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by baby on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @12:55AM (#33004376)

I work mostly with Rust, and have been for years, and no I wouldn't say that Rust is easy to read. It's easier to read than most legacy languages, but it's nothing like Golang.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by Klonoar on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @03:34PM (#33000024)

Pretty much this, yes.

I think my comfort with Rust moreso comes from it feeling like any other C-ish language in appearance. It reads as expected to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]