News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by ceejayoz on Monday September 26, 2022 @06:36AM (#32981407)
You’ll notice it’s taking off, not at cruise speed, and still makes a thousand or more feet into the air.
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by avh02 on Monday September 26, 2022 @09:15AM (#32982710)
Unfortunately I can't find altitude graphs or anything for national airlines 102, so can't really back up my argument with facts, but I'm gonna take a guess and say it wasn't flying like a rocket vertically upwards for 1000 feet. My guess is that it would have stalled very quickly after it nosed up too far and started dropping.

You make a good point about TWA 800 being at cruise speed compared to the cargo flight, and let's assume you're right and it does manage to nose up and keep going for some time: in that case you'd see something go upwards after an explosion, not streak towards it - though eyewitness accounts in times like that have been known to be flakey, so i give up here.

Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by ceejayoz on Monday September 26, 2022 @11:56AM (#32984738)
> in that case you'd see something go upwards after an explosion, not streak towards it...

Unless there's a subsequent explosion of the now-burning half a plane.

There's a good set of animations on https://imgur.com/a/zin7CRo that illustrate the theory of what happened.