News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adversarial Collaboration by watwut on Monday September 26, 2022 @02:01AM (#32979900)
Personally, I am glad that culture is moving away from rewarding confident certain statements that are simply untrue.
Re:Adversarial Collaboration by LeonB on Monday September 26, 2022 @04:26AM (#32980722)
Citation needed.

Also - relevance?

The tagline being questioned here is—

“People don't change their minds”

— the problem with which is not that it’s “simply untrue” but that it requires qualification, e.g. in the prose of the linked article it’s written:

“To a good first approximation, people simply don't change their minds about anything that matters”

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by watwut on Monday September 26, 2022 @08:15AM (#32982159)
> Citation needed.

Citation for personal preference? Or for claim that currently confidence is rewarded more then accuracy?

> the problem with which is not that it’s “simply untrue” but that

The statement is untrue, because people do change minds. People change minds also about stuff that matters. They dont do it often, but they do it.

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by xapata on Monday September 26, 2022 @02:15PM (#32986334)
> is moving away

I think the citation would be for "is moving away" as that's the most bold claim.

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by watwut on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @11:07AM (#32996290)
That was the premise of the comment I reacted to. It says: I’m starting to see more and more people demand quantifiers or conditional disqualifiers on statements that shouldn’t reasonably be considered as absolutes.

Seeing more and more people demand such qualifiers is culture moving away.