News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ... by exhilaration on Sunday September 25, 2022 @12:32PM (#32973008)
Do you know if gphotos-sync downloads the photos in their original quality/version?
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ... by buro9 on Sunday September 25, 2022 @12:40PM (#32973090)
It does.

The only thing that it gets wrong is that it cannot restore the file created date to video. But in the grand scheme of things, that's a nit.

Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ... by exhilaration on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:07PM (#32974129)
Unfortunately it looks like it's subject to the same limitation of the Google Photos API: Photo download compresses the photos even if you ask for the original file https://gilesknap.github.io/gphotos-sync/main/explanations/g...

I've been putting off a Google photos back up for years, and this was my excuse - waiting for this issue to be resolved. But I'm being a fool, 60% compression is better than losing everything.

Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ... by buro9 on Monday September 26, 2022 @05:09AM (#32980951)
Ah you are correct.

I have just compared originals I had which were uploaded to Google Photos vs the ones downloaded.

Visually there is a barely perceptible difference in a side-by-side comparison on a high quality and calibrated monitor. I wouldn't have noticed if it weren't side-by-side and zoomed in.

On the file size, it's gone from a 6MB jpeg down to about a 1.5MB jpeg.

On the smaller files that difference is far less, but jpegs above 3MB seem to see the biggest reduction in file size.

Thankfully I have all of my originals that weren't taken on the phone camera so I don't mind this so much as running my exiftool script over the original archive produces the same naming convention and I can merge those folders and still have the originals I care about.

Sheesh though... such a thing for Google to screw up on.