Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by ReactiveJelly on Sunday September 25, 2022 @11:11AM
(#32972075)
The promise of the cloud was that you don't need local storage, because Someone Else will remember things for you, and you just ask them what you remember. This is also the problem of the cloud.
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by rsync on Sunday September 25, 2022 @01:16PM
(#32973521)
"The promise of the cloud was that you don't need local storage, because Someone Else will remember things for you ..."
Agreed. And that promise has been fulfilled - although it costs more than nothing and you need to do your homework.
You know these providers are proven bad actors. You know their business model(s) are antagonistic to your goals. You also know there are stable, time-tested alternatives.
What did you think was going to happen here ?
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by sgregnt on Sunday September 25, 2022 @01:51PM
(#32973950)
I would say at least partially aligned with your goals otherwise why would you use them in the first place?
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by Godel_unicode on Sunday September 25, 2022 @05:59PM
(#32976801)
They’re unaligned with rsync.net’s goal of getting people to pay for services.
Edit: to pay a minimum of $12/month??
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by gbasin on Sunday September 25, 2022 @12:33PM
(#32973016)
ok and then what? :D you still can't recover original
Re:Users reporting artifacts appearing in old images stored ...
by johnnymorgan on Sunday September 25, 2022 @10:22AM
(#32971610)
Exactly..what is proof of existence for $400 Alex
You can just hash them locally or use AI to identify modifications.