Whatever ethos you imagine Rust developers uniquely have, it doesn't address any of the constraints and incentives that are creating the code quality problems in automotive. Even the best developers in the world would have a difficult time producing a quality product in that environment.
They tend to seem more of the type to go on strike, form a union, or leave a job because of political views.
> Even the best developers in the world would have a difficult time producing a quality product in that environment.
Right, i'm saying I think at least more experienced rust developers would refuse to work in that environment.
They seem like they would risk more of their own well-being for ethical reasons, for better or worse.
I suppose if Volvo started depending on highly socially conscious domain experts and had a choice between changing working conditions and ditching rust though, they'd change the latter.
I'm happy to be proven wrong, but experienced C programmers seem to be more conservative "don't mix politics and programming" types.
It's amazing that you're saying all that and the same time completely oblivious to the fact that Volvo is in Sweden. Which has unions, labor protection, amazing working conditions etc. etc.
The reason Volvo is doing what it's doing is due to Volvo's commitment to safety [1] and not because of some mythical exclusively social ethos of some programmers.
[1] https://www.volvogroup.com/en/about-us/traffic-safety/safety...
I'm curious to see if the Rust programmers affect the organizations as well by introducing unions to combat this kind if thing.
On another note I disagree that language will have no meanigful effect, even in a hostile environment such as this.