Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by mook on Friday September 23, 2022 @07:37PM
(#32958333)
> Speaking of incentive structures, one of my former employers installed EV chargers in all of the bottom floors of our parking garage while explicitly not allowing non-EVs to park in those spaces.
Sounds like it worked out great for them — people who could afford living in single detached houses (generally the richer ones, and therefore generally the management) now get reserved parking out of the pollen. The people who are inconvenienced (i.e. you) weren't the people involved in the decision anyway.
Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by morsch on Saturday September 24, 2022 @01:45AM
(#32959997)
Buy a small EV for everyday trips and rent another car for road trips. Nobody in our car culture, where people drive F150s just in case they need them; nobody is going to do that, but environmentally it'd be much preferable to everybody getting a big Tesla weighing several tons.
Financially it works out for a couple of road trips a year, not so much if you're doing it a couple of times a month.
Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by nikau on Saturday September 24, 2022 @02:17AM
(#32960110)
Or get a plug in hybrid that results in the convenience of one car but most of the environmental/cost benefits.
Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by bagels on Saturday September 24, 2022 @12:04AM
(#32959654)
The harm is polen on your car? It's harm, sure, but seems pretty minor at this point.
Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by kodah on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:18PM
(#32974257)
I have pretty bad allergies, the pollen messed with me quite a bit.
The real harm I think is giving too many perceived privileges to something that is currently a luxury.
Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study
by samizdette on Friday September 23, 2022 @10:47PM
(#32959327)
Did you look at plug-in hybrids? They can use the chargers.
> So yes, there are weird red herrings in this thread from people who want a technology first and a solution second (or never) and/or who don't understand design of incentive structures.
Speaking of incentive structures, one of my former employers installed EV chargers in all of the bottom floors of our parking garage while explicitly not allowing non-EVs to park in those spaces. I was left parking my hybrid on the roof in a desert climate where my car would continually get covered with pollen.
Naturally, I did what they were trying to incentivize: I looked at EVs. I quickly discovered that the cheaper models have limited usecases; for instance, the road trips I go on would now be out of the picture. The more expensive ones are much more functional but come at a high price that I've never personally spent on a car.
There's also the fact that I didn't have anywhere to charge it except public spaces where I'd have to awkwardly wait for hours because I lived in an apartment. In order to get a 240v plug in my garage I would need to pay for it myself.
These policies, as they invade the workforce, need to be looked at from a lens that doesn't end up doing harm in the end.