Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by DropPanda on Friday September 23, 2022 @11:40AM (#32953420)

Surprisingly, transmission efficiency (grid to motor) does not appear to be lower with inductive methods than conductive. Numbers above 90% should be expected. A bit lower for the dynamic (in-motion) solutions, but not so much that it’s a deal breaker. There seem to be much larger savings/costs elsewhere in the system that make transmission efficiency of less importance.

Cars that are stationary most of the time are a pretty good reason to put charging infrastructure on the only land they actually share - the roads.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by Gasp0de on Friday September 23, 2022 @12:04PM (#32953752)

This source (https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-412-charging-withou....) says efficiency is only 75-80% when charging inductively. Do you have any better sources for those 90%?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by throwawayallday on Friday September 23, 2022 @01:04PM (#32954445)

Witricity claims to have inductive charging efficiency that matches traditional plug-in level 2 charging:

https://witricity.com/newsroom/blogs/what-is-efficiency-how-...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by DropPanda on Friday September 23, 2022 @12:18PM (#32953914)

It’s hard to get data from non-biased sources, given that there are no commercial installations yet.

Some numbers are thrown around here (static inductive): https://insideevs.com/news/425972/momentum-dynamics-wireless...

And here (dynamic inductive): https://www.greencarcongress.com/2022/06/20220614-electreon....

From what I have heard, the transmission efficiency of the dynamic inductive solution is quite sensitive to alignment and they still have some R&D left to do there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by Kirby64 on Friday September 23, 2022 @12:29PM (#32954052)

Remember, when you charge your cell phone, you charge at ~15W (or less), so 80% efficiency is something like 3W of power loss. You can dissipate that pretty easily.

For a car charging, you're charging closer to 7-11kW. Dissipating 2.2kW (20% of 11kW) as heat is basically impossible. The inductive charging they're using for cars (which, are basically mostly prototypes at this point) are different and use much more closely coupled coils... so they can get better efficiency. Whether it works in practice, I don't know, but that's what companies are claiming who come out with these solutions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Charging cars at home at night is not the way to go: study by Scoundreller on Friday September 23, 2022 @04:25PM (#32956632)

I worry that my phone’s battery gets hotter while charging so it’s getting double damage when it comes to lifespan. Maybe we should add a fan to inductive phone chargers…

(Doesn’t help that 99% of people run a case on their phones, and I doubt the manufacturer’s inductive charging efficiency tests account for that)

[ Parent | on HN ]