Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by eddof13 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @03:07PM
(#32943278)
it aligns with my values on free speech and I think social media platforms should be common carriers and be forced to allow all free speech (aside from fire in a crowded theater)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by colinmhayes on Thursday September 22, 2022 @07:51PM
(#32946148)
Hard to believe people who have actually thought about the consequences of demoderation could possibly support it. It would instantly be the end of all forums. Moderation isn't always perfect, but it is infinitely better than a free for all.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by cowtools on Thursday September 22, 2022 @08:32PM
(#32946465)
The alternative to centralized moderation is voluntary peer-to-peer communication, not a firehose.
Something like secushare would take the place of forums I assume: https://secushare.org/society
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by triceratops on Thursday September 22, 2022 @03:17PM
(#32943412)
Enjoy the deluge of spam
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by kelseyfrog on Thursday September 22, 2022 @07:26PM
(#32945957)
As a post-social media accelerationalist, the utter chaos that would result in social media platforms' inability to combat spam would devolve into the inability to exist at all and should be welcomed. Social media's negative externality is our individual mental health. One of the greatest things we could do for our mental health would be a complete and utter implosion of uncensorable social media. It cannot come soon enough.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by cowtools on Thursday September 22, 2022 @08:29PM
(#32946445)
I didn't read this whole thing but I agree it would be pretty funny if social media was legally forced to host spam
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by triceratops on Friday September 23, 2022 @12:57PM
(#32954376)
I mostly hate social media. But we'd also lose useful things. Such as the discussion board we're currently on. Or the treasure trove of educational and funny content on YouTube. Watching puppy videos is amazing for my mental health. It would be a shame for it to be drowned in spam.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by kelseyfrog on Friday September 23, 2022 @01:24PM
(#32954706)
It would honestly be better for me if social media categorically ceased to exist. Before anyone responds with, "You could choose not to participate," what I mean is that if they ceased to exist it would increase the supply of the attention and time of others. When I'm competing in time and attention for others with the likes FB/IG/TT I'm simply at the loosing end. I don't have a team of PhDs whose goal it is to increase people's engagement with me - they do. If I have to compete at all, I'd much rather compete with other people - not against professionals.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks...
by b0sk on Thursday September 22, 2022 @03:25PM
(#32943505)
And getting banned because you repeatedly say that the election is fraud and urge your supporters to storm the capitol (and getting one such person killed) isn't the equivalent of fire in a crowded theater?
Moderation is hard. They get it right 99% of the time.