News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by _msw_ on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @08:09PM (#32933293)
Disclosure: I work for Amazon, and in the past I worked directly on EC2.

From the FAQ: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/

Q: How does EC2 perform maintenance?

AWS regularly performs routine hardware, power, and network maintenance with minimal disruption across all EC2 instance types. To achieve this we employ a combination of tools and methods across the entire AWS Global infrastructure, such as redundant and concurrently maintainable systems, as well as live system updates and migration.

Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by darkwater on Thursday September 22, 2022 @08:58AM (#32938203)
> AWS regularly performs routine hardware, power, and network maintenance with minimal disruption across all EC2 instance types. To achieve this we employ a combination of tools and methods across the entire AWS Global infrastructure, such as redundant and concurrently maintainable systems, as well as live system updates and migration.

And yet, I keep getting almost every weeks emails like this:

"EC2 has detected degradation of the underlying hardware hosting your Amazon EC2 instance (instance-ID: i-xxxxxxx) associated with your AWS account (AWS Account ID: NNNNN) in the eu-west-1 region. Due to this degradation your instance could already be unreachable. We will stop your instance after 2022-09-21 16:00:00 UTC"

And we don't have tens of thousands of VMs in that region, just around 1k.

Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by _msw_ on Thursday September 22, 2022 @12:51PM (#32941499)
Live migration can't be used to address every type of maintenance or underlying fault in a non-disruptive way.