jurisdiction = GDPR will not be cheated.
European = We mistrust America, because they do crappy stuff that meant we had to pass GDPR.
>Europe’s digital sovereignty
Means - Europe will not be ruled by interests outside Europe, the interests inside Europe can fight it out via EU procedures.
Are there (m)any global search engines with European users who are "cheating" GDPR? Which ones?
> Europe will not be ruled by interests outside Europe
That's a very bold claim, especially considering the geopolitical situation right now.
> the interests inside Europe can fight it out via EU procedures
Would that be the interests of the estimated 25k-30k lobbyists who work in Brussels on behalf of their corporate paymasters?
>Would that be the interests of the estimated 25k-30k lobbyists who work in Brussels on behalf of their corporate paymasters?
probably, as well as the various governments that exist in the EU.
But we still mistrust our citizens that's why we introduce Chat-control 2.0, so we have a "better then China" control over private communication.
European values ;)
That's why People trust evil-company's more then stupid[1] Governments.
[1] never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
I'm not suspicious of all government-funded projects (back in the day my own PhD was government-funded!) but I can't help be suspicious of claims such as:
"an open European infrastructure for internet search, based on European values and jurisdiction"
and
"The project will be contributing to Europe’s digital sovereignty"
Q1: Who defines "European values"? Is that done by Qualified Majority voting or would - for instance - Hungary have a veto on any proposed definition?
Q2: Which treaties regulate "digital sovereignty"? Recalling that the 27 member states each "remain sovereign and independent"[0], is that digital sovereignty being handled in BRU, in the 27 states, or a mixture of both?
[0] https://op.europa.eu/webpub/com/eu-what-it-is/en/