Re:Next steps for Rust in the kernel
by marcus0x62 on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @11:23AM
(#32926430)
Eh? Bash predates Linux by a couple of years. I don’t remember any early Linux system — my frame of reference begins in 1994 — without bash as the default shell.
Re:Next steps for Rust in the kernel
by mschuster91 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @04:19AM
(#32936145)
The common Debian expectation to this day is to keep acting like you only had POSIX shell features aka /bin/sh [1]. You may use /bin/bash if you like though.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-scr...
Re:Next steps for Rust in the kernel
by marcus0x62 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @04:30PM
(#32944230)
That may be their expectation stylistically, but the first Debian release shipped[1] with bash as the default shell. I’m not aware of them ever having shipped the original Bourne shell. Your claim — that I was responding to - was that on early Linux systems you might only find the Bourne shell but not bash. That simply was not the case.
1 - http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian/dists/buzz/m...
The commands supported by `sh` are... let's keep it at "fossilized from somewhere in the 80s", and so the only alternative was perl which has a ... history of being not exactly user-friendly to code for.