Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by pmontra on Saturday September 17, 2022 @03:29AM
(#32875515)
Let's suppose we shoot a piece of steel in space and after one billion year it splashes into an alien ocean. Natives take it ashore. Would they be able to understand that after all the exposure to radiation and possible collisions it's not only a lump of iron, carbon and a few other elements but something made by people somewhere else? Would it look like a normal meteor or its composition and structure is different?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by guerrilla on Saturday September 17, 2022 @05:26AM
(#32876083)
Not an expert but I'm pretty sure it'd be easily identifiable as artificial because of the uniform composition and regular grain structure in steel. I think it would not only be clear that it was refined because of purity but also that it was far more regular than something natural. [1]
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by bnegreve on Saturday September 17, 2022 @06:30AM
(#32876391)
Some crystals are very regular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal#/media/File:Ho-Mg-ZnQu...
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by vardump on Saturday September 17, 2022 @06:41AM
(#32876426)
There might be a different isotope signature, that might give its origin away.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by Sporktacular on Saturday September 17, 2022 @08:54AM
(#32877137)
If it appeared worthy of analysis.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by marcosdumay on Saturday September 17, 2022 @11:40AM
(#32878394)
It will certainly look unusual. It's not clear to me that it will look artificial (we are pretty bad at deciding that one), but it won't look like anything else around it.