News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fliers Must Turn Off Devices, but It’s Not Clear Why. Parent comment

Re:Fliers Must Turn Off Devices, but It’s Not Clear Why by ddagradi on Monday November 28, 2011 @08:42AM (#3285778)
> That's not the point. The fact that people have items out (and are possibly blocking exit rows etc), and are not fully aware of the events leading up to the situation is likely to have some impact on the eventual outcome.

Books and magazines present the same problems as a Kindle. So does a sleeping passenger. Safety should be taken as seriously as possible, but the inconsistent application of the rules only implies that no one has put any real thought into it thus far.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fliers Must Turn Off Devices, but It’s Not Clear Why by bunderbunder on Monday November 28, 2011 @11:40AM (#3286526)
On the other hand, I believe Emerson said something pithy about consistently minding your hobgoblins (or something like that). Or, as hackers are more likely to put it: "The 90% solution is usually your best bet."

That said, if you you really do want to have them take away books and magazines and force everyone to stay awake during takeoff and landing, feel free to write a letter to the FAA.

[ Parent | on HN ]