Cannabis is federally illegal, sex toys and porn have incredibly high chargeback rates and crypto has this handy thing where since you can't reverse anything, as soon as the crypto you bought is out of the custody wallet you cant get the thing back so the chargeback rates are also very high.

Don't believe me? Ask anyone at the front desk of a hotel the rate of attempted chargebacks for ppv porn.

You can get vetted by banks, visa and co for those things (maybe not cannabis with US companies) but the fees are considerably higher because of the chargeback rates. This is why onlyfans announced then backtracked the porn ban, visa told them "either you're paying us like you distribute porn, or you stop doing it".

If it's the case, perhaps it makes more sense to block based on chargeback rate (that's actually what payment processors are doing) instead of blocking on nature of business?

This seems incredibly obvious, and would probably be fairly easy once your business picks up volume. That or make you absorb the charge backs yourself, or via an independently-contracted insurance.

> the front desk of a hotel the rate of attempted chargebacks for ppv porn

To be honest this seems more like a hotel problem than a porn problem. E.g., I viewed it by mistake, I didn't understand the pricing, etc. I would expect that there is a similar amount of complaints about the hotel room's minibar and snacks that are lying there but charged an incredible rate afterwards if touched.

Re: cannabis, it's federally illegal and you can get into serious legal trouble for facilitating payments. There have been several attempts to write legislation to fix this so state-legal cannabis operations don't have to work entirely with cash, but none have passed yet.

Re: porn, the issue is its sky-high chargeback rates.

Am I missing something? That thread from almost two months ago is about a completely different business. OP linked it in his initial post, mentioning that reading it was what triggered him to post this one, but nothing more than that.

It may be related to a general policy of burning grey market businesses that has been going on for a decade or so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point

While I don't know what the incentives are for payment processors, they act as though they are under a quota, similar to SARs in banks, where it's mainly about showing they are getting petty crime as a means to protect their interest in partnership level crime.

re: sex toys, potential felony in texas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_obscenity_statute

or google "texas six dildoes"

<edit> https://www.theregister.com/2016/12/13/us_purchase_governmen...

and https://onwardtexas.org/trending/is-it-illegal-to-own-more-t...

which was posted on HN about 3 months ago and flagged.

</edit>

You could rape someone with a dildo, it is basically a gun and should be banned as such!

Credit card processing requires a sponsor bank, and that sponsor bank sets what categories they want to process for. If you fall out of that, or the account gets reviewed a second time and someone thinks it falls into one of those categories, the account is shut down. OF almost had this happen to them because of their sponsor bank and I've seen it happen for other companies from the underwriting department (not stripe, another processor).

In addition to the other comment about cannabis, crypto is financial and comes with many laws and regulations that a payment process would need to be very aware of and follow.

Porn is ripe with fraud/theft/bad actors/etc.

It’s not a shadow government, it’s common sense.

It is a shadow government but it also makes sense.

It’s not a shadow government if the laws and policy are public. You can read all of the laws.

> It’s not a shadow government if the laws and policy are public. You can read all of the laws.

This is not really true. The BSA says banks have to maintain an "adequate AML program" and policies to "reasonably know your customers identities" or whatever. These policies are deliberately vague. Then based on these deliberately vague rules, banks have to make a compliance program that usually goes above and beyond the minimum that is required (in order to avoid being fined). These compliance programs that specify what kinds of behavior and transactions to consider risky are never made public.

there's no FOIA for banking processes that affect you. consumer finance protection regulations are also a complete joke (oh no, banks have to file some more reports, oh the horror).

Basically "educate yourself", yes?

There’s a really good Podcast from FT on the payment issues with porn. It’s more complicated than the chargeback rates. If you want to go down that rabbit hole: https://www.ft.com/content/762e4648-06d7-4abd-8d1e-ccefb74b3... The podcast is quite a nice history wrap-up on online payments. Episode 8 addresses the current situation with credit card companies most detailed.

> It almost feels like there's some secret government organization tasked with upholding religious values telling payment processors to fuck with random accounts and swearing them to secrecy. I obviously don't believe that, but it's equivalent to the scale of whatever is going on due to natural causes.

Operation Choke Point pretty much worked like that.

I don't have a problem with the government fucking with the cannibis business given that it's still federally illegal, but the messing with legal businesses needs to stop.

> I don't believe that these industries are prone to higher than usual fraud.

This belief might be wrong - or at least not shared by payment processors?

"whatever is going on due to natural causes" lol

Nice to see my post linked. Last time I was accused of being a shill account, however I just do not post often. :D