Likewise, the likelihood of a startup succeeding is gated by the intelligence of its employees. Successful founders know this and hire accordingly.
I’ve yet to see a sound argument for why it’s ok for a company to discriminate on intelligence, but not for a country to. And of course many countries that are seen as having admirable immigration policies, such as Canada, do exactly that through various proxy measures.
In the US, it's officially illegal for companies to discriminate based on intelligence, thanks to Griggs v. Duke Power.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/overturn-griggs-v-du...
One could argue that a democracy by definition must have free speech. Otherwise, it's more of a "vote on the options provided by the ruling class". My question was meant as an actual question, is the illusion of democracy better than democracy for survival?
I use the word survival because it's the first law of life.
I use "right wing extremists" to make fun of people who think free speech is a right wing idea, or that opposing low-iq immigration is extreme.
I didn't mention political parties, nor mean to imply anything.
They didn't, they only gave a general warning to watch out for misinformation[1].
Facebook censored the Hunter Biden laptop story on their own volition. Zuckerberg mentioned FBI in that Rogan interview to muddy the waters and deflect responsibility. He didn't actually say that FBI ordered them to do anything.
[1] - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/fbi-responds-...
Right wing extremists would say yes. In fact, this is why they believe we shouldn't allow low cognitive ability immigrants into the country or let them vote.