News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On my resignation as regulator of the Dutch intelligence ... by Waterluvian on Saturday September 10, 2022 @06:47AM (#32789439)
The opposite is also true, in a sense. The secret court was created by an elected government, technically held accountable by people that can loudly say, “that is not okay and is why we are electing someone else.”

In practice it really doesn’t work that way, though.

Re:On my resignation as regulator of the Dutch intelligence ... by TEP_Kim_Il_Sung on Saturday September 10, 2022 @07:15AM (#32789593)
The democratic process, when used for political decision making, creates the appearance of legitimacy, and invokes the natural human herd mentality to stifle dissent. The main difference between regular democratic decisions, and political ones; is that the former are voluntary, and applicable to all participants; whereas the latter are unilaterally applied to all, regardless of real consent. Try applying this to regular situations, such as shopping, or love making, to see why this is bad.
Re:On my resignation as regulator of the Dutch intelligence ... by pessimizer on Saturday September 10, 2022 @11:07AM (#32791294)
It depends on if you think that a society that runs a successful plebiscite where its population votes to never have another vote remains a democracy. Voting for the central processes of government to be hidden from you, and for informed participation in them by the population to be made impossible, is a constitutional failure. It also creates powerful hidden parts of the government that can exert control over the public parts of government.
Re:On my resignation as regulator of the Dutch intelligence ... by ekianjo on Saturday September 10, 2022 @09:22AM (#32790379)
you dont vote for every decision that an elected government takes. so in fact no democracy is a true democracy, merely the fake appearance of giving some power to people where they actually have none.