Re:Contrarian perspective on mainstream climate change claims
by eimrine on Friday September 09, 2022 @03:45PM
(#32783989)
Not an expert, but as a hobbyist farmer I can feel some differences in climate, so I am on witnesses of global warming side of the conflict.
The page [1] seems like careful cherry-picking of "good" facts. Presenting text information in pictures hardly obstructing analysis, especially for those who are not fluent in English. The most disturbing for me fact in the punchline was the tweet about fracking [2], because this is a nonsense in every word.
And one more thing. Note how webpage is called - "The case against environmental alarmism". But those hopeful graphs with declining trend of annual carbon emissions were achieved because of climate activists (may I missing some other forces that stimulate businessmen to do less emissions??) and no respect to activists has been given.
The page [1] seems like careful cherry-picking of "good" facts. Presenting text information in pictures hardly obstructing analysis, especially for those who are not fluent in English. The most disturbing for me fact in the punchline was the tweet about fracking [2], because this is a nonsense in every word.
And one more thing. Note how webpage is called - "The case against environmental alarmism". But those hopeful graphs with declining trend of annual carbon emissions were achieved because of climate activists (may I missing some other forces that stimulate businessmen to do less emissions??) and no respect to activists has been given.
[1] https://environmentalprogress.org/the-case-against-environme...
[2] https://twitter.com/shellenbergermd/status/14993866370667274...