News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Building a house in California is not a housing developme... by CPLX on Thursday September 08, 2022 @06:39PM (#32772985)
> I really don't see how this would solve anything. It'd allow existing areas of SFH to be slowly converted into duplexes.

Twice as much housing is a lot more housing.

Re:Building a house in California is not a housing developme... by sidewndr46 on Thursday September 08, 2022 @06:42PM (#32773010)
But it isn't. You think all those SFH lots are just going overnight become a duplex? Why would the retired lady who walks her dogs and tends the garden care about building a duplex?

Now when her kids inherit the home & sell it to a developer, sure it'll happen then. But that is a slow, generational process.

Re:Building a house in California is not a housing developme... by jspaetzel on Thursday September 08, 2022 @06:51PM (#32773105)
Yeah exactly, it's a nice slow process that wouldn't piss people off by having too much rapid change.
Re:Building a house in California is not a housing developme... by ImPostingOnHN on Sunday September 11, 2022 @12:49PM (#32801184)
I think the point is that it's far too slow to ever make a difference. Is there an existing city which has ever successfully "graduated" through all these levels?
Re:Building a house in California is not a housing developme... by sidewndr46 on Thursday September 08, 2022 @06:57PM (#32773171)
I think you need to meet some of the NIMBYs where I live.