Re:Stop measuring community engagement
by marginalia_nu on Thursday September 08, 2022 @02:48PM
(#32770188)
Why does it need to be measurable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stop measuring community engagement
by kelseyfrog on Thursday September 08, 2022 @08:37PM
(#32773941)
HN in general isn't aware of operationalization[1]. It's an interesting quirk of computer science being a STEM field, but CS research is qualitatively different from physics, sociology, psychology, biology, zoology, and ag science. Rather, the typical CS student has a pre-theoretical conceptualization of quantification and data collection as it pertains to research methodology.
Instead of relying on operationaluzation, the phenomena is considered strictly immeasurable. It leaves a lot on the table. In the examples above, for instance, there are a number of unsubstantiated assumptions as well as pros and cons that implicitly do not account for operationalization and it shows.
Re:Stop measuring community engagement
by jholman on Thursday September 08, 2022 @10:53PM
(#32774760)
Off-topic, but learning about classic examples of operationalization is when I realized that mostly psychology isn't a real science (yet). I believe the canonical example involved me learning the phrase "bobo doll".
Re:Stop measuring community engagement
by kelseyfrog on Friday September 09, 2022 @12:22PM
(#32781194)
How interesting, same with operationalization in physics too?
Re:Stop measuring community engagement
by marginalia_nu on Friday September 09, 2022 @03:57AM
(#32776570)
This still doesn't answer my question of why.