News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A nice picture of (dependency) hell by udp on Friday November 25, 2011 @07:17AM (#3276907)
Why didn't you call it something non-controversial like "A visualisation of open-source software dependencies" instead of "A nice picture of (dependency) hell", then?
Re:A nice picture of (dependency) hell by dcESC on Friday November 25, 2011 @07:33AM (#3276920)
Sensationalism? If you would like a post with a less controversial name, have a look at "High resolution dependency graph".

Sorry if you felt cheated by the title :)

Re:A nice picture of (dependency) hell by davidw on Friday November 25, 2011 @07:26AM (#3276914)
The obvious answer is that the former would not generate nearly so much interest/clicks/attention.