Re:Globalstar SEC filing, Apple to use 85% of its satellite ...
by mschuster91 on Thursday September 08, 2022 @10:33AM
(#32766130)
The threat model is that B has no way of knowing if she is actually being tracked (or if she could potentially be), or if A has just made empty threats. By coercion - or by manipulating the setting on his own on B's phone without A knowing -, A could prevent her from finding out that she could be tracked by someone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Globalstar SEC filing, Apple to use 85% of its satellite ...
by lostlogin on Thursday September 08, 2022 @12:34PM
(#32767994)
And here we are - I haven’t bought any.
I want to track the dog, the shared cars’ keys. I want to track a shared bike. There are a load of items I’d put them on, but they aren’t just mine.
I don’t believe it’s a security thing. It’s the Apple way to get software to a point then just stop development, there are plenty of examples.
Re:Globalstar SEC filing, Apple to use 85% of its satellite ...
by mschuster91 on Friday September 09, 2022 @03:19AM
(#32776297)
Apple however can't differentiate between someone wishing to track their dog and someone wishing to track their spouse - at that point basic ethics come to play. It's bad enough that AirTags even exist, the absurd amount of stalking cases proves it, but now Apple is all but forced to rein the bullshit in.