>a repeated event that carries non-zero probability for an adverse effect increases the cumulative probability of said adverse effect when it recurs.
is true by logical necessity. It doesn't need peer-review citation because is it's a synthetic apriori proposition (and also straight out of Probability 101, which unsurprisingly you haven't attended/understood), it's not an empirical claim depending on data.
I would say "learn to read with comprehension" but I fear it's not possible.
>posting medical misinformation
Very rich coming from a person literally reposting conspiracy talking points off from antivax twitter.
You are making things up without scientific basis.
you need to provide some evidence instead of endlessly misusing some heuristic, or principle like Occam's Razor.
I don't need to show any work since covid infection AND reinfection has already been proven beyond any doubt to have non-zero risk of adverse effects on those that don't die from the infection. So either provide proof that covid reinfection carries 0 risk of permanent sequelae or stop wasting my time with the ridiculous claim that reducing the number of times someone is getting reinfected has no health benefit.