trention
Davinci costs 2 cents for 1000 tokens (≈600 words), so no.
Yes, preventing freedom of association is actually bad.
But, of course, your goal is to force people with legitimate preferences for not associating with other groups of people to do your bidding.
And because of that you deserve and will get the boot.
People on the left like you don't get to make that argument. You have been shutting people up and preventing freedom of association since the 60s in the USA.
Are you sure you are not an illegitimate offspring of Fukuyama and a post-transition Henry Beecher?
You don't have an argument, you have a Fukuyama-sized delusion infused with ridiculous secular theology that is about to pop in the next decades.
Please, do enlighten us how the first multi-cellular organism was literally the Whig view of history embodied. It will be very entertaining.
It may surprise you but any form of social ostracism that is not government sanctioned will not achieve any of that regarding regular people. It will affect only celebrities and a segment of the public intellectuals. (But there will be a different segment that will benefit)
Regarding kanye west, his biggest problem was that a significant chunk of his "sponsors" (=board members of companies) and business partners were actually jewish. Had he said the same thing about Australian Aboriginals (or the same thing about jews but if his main market was East Asia), he'd be completely fine after the initial outrage subsided. So I don't think you actually understand anything about your example at all.
If there was no government-sanctioned affirmative action and if discrimination of the basis of race was not outlawed, all the consequences in the world would not change the fact that the "cancel culture whiners" (your own words) will rise in status (both social and economic) relative to minorities and liberals. So, yes - actions do have consequences, including for you.
Elaborate on how and why exactly you think they should be afraid.
Should they be afraid for their physical safety because you want violence against them to not be punishable (or the state to have to enact such violence by law)?
Should they be afraid for their freedom because you want hate speech laws instituted that would land them in jail?
Nobody is afraid to voice their opinion because of the disapproval of leftists and "liberals" so it should be one of the 2 above or something similar.
"I'm just asking questions about why the Earth is round" is bad-faith.
"Im just asking questions about why we shouldn't implement Operation Wetback 2023 and forcefully deport all illegals, even if that costs a trillion dollars and involves tremendous amounts of violence" is not.
Most (all?) of continental Europe actually has such laws, which is why you don't hear about american style firings here. So, your logic has been tested in practice and found out to be wrong.
No, there are not. Anything you say outside of your working time is not the business of your employer.
You won't be able to if you look solely at the output. There are ways to check audit and verify the process by which said output was produced. They are also gamable but the cost of gaming them is not insignificant.
Well, they do start with the delusional "copilot writes 40% of your code" microsoft marketing bullshit which everyone who has ever used it knows is not true, so it really is "garbage in, garbage out".
Because the AI is not a human and only humans have rights, including the right to learn.
Is it patent trolling when you are defending your future labor from being made obsolete by megacorps and signularitarians using your past labor without permission?
No, it's justice.
Why do humans play chess after 1997? Why do they play checkers after the 70s?
AI capability is destroying human enjoyment of activities because it also destroys the economic rationale for engaging in them and/or allows other humans to cheat.
The obvious conclusion of this position is that we should just all kill ourselves if strong AI ever starts to exists. No, thank you, I'd rather do everything possible to prevent it from being created.
It's unclear to what extend tool producers will support AI in this context at all. Also, this is a problem for safeguarding the integrity of the product of artists, not for safeguarding their income.