News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by blihp on Monday September 05, 2022 @11:45PM (#32732580)
Tolkien created one of the most fleshed out fantasy universes to date. As a result, there's a not inconsiderable number of die hard fans who don't react well to disregarding canon as there is a rather insane amount of detail spelled out in the books.

As long as one can get in the mindset of 'this is some disposable Tolkien-ish fantasy content', it's an OK bit of filler (IMO, having watched the first couple of episodes)

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by OrvalWintermute on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @12:54AM (#32733005)
> As a result, there's a not inconsiderable number of die hard fans who don't react well to disregarding canon as there is a rather insane amount of detail spelled out in the books.

This sounds very similar to what happened with the fans of the well-known Wheel of Time series. Given the broad divergence from the canon, the future of the series is in doubt [1]

[1] https://screenrant.com/wheel-time-show-backlash-controversy-...

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by MichaelCollins on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @03:18AM (#32733990)
I don't understand why they even bothered trying to adapt the Wheel of Time. The values expressed in those books, particularly w.r.t. gender, were obviously going to clash hard with the present zeitgeist and necessitated butchering the story to bring it into compliance. Anybody could have seen that coming. They should have just written a new story.

In no particular order:

Conflict between men and women leads to ruination.

Men need women and women need men, without the other they aren't complete.

Men are naturally stronger than women, but women make up for it with teamwork.

Powerful men get harems. Men frequently take multiple wives but the reverse is virtually unheard of.

Slavery as a cultural difference to be respected.

Good guys allying themselves with an empire built by the chattel slavery of women.

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by LegitShady on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @09:07AM (#32736577)
Wheel of Time season 2 was confirmed before season 1 ended and season 3 was confirmed before any part of season 2 aired.

Amazon is doubling down. Expect more of this sort of "we'll buy your favorite property and change it and there's nothing you can do about it". Nothing that is still protected by copyright is sacred, you just need a rich enough business to buy it to change it.

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by ethbr0 on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @12:13AM (#32732753)
This feels different though.

(a) Most of the angry people haven't even watched (!) the few episodes (!!) that are out.

(b) I'm not sure most of the outraged are Tolkien fans. It honestly feels more like dog piling / mob hysteria.

When did we become consumers of visual media where "I don't like it, and I haven't and won't watch it" is a valid position to publicly kvetch about?

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by CleaveIt2Beaver on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @09:08AM (#32736603)
I've seen several memes presented to me by Facebook, since it's normally the kind of content and subject matter I'd consume, counseling people to not even "hate-watch" it. So there is some variety of blind opposition or boycot afoot, and shockingly, the comment sections very frequently come back around to color-blind casting.
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by therealdrag0 on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @08:42AM (#32736329)
How do you know they haven’t watched it?
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by ethbr0 on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @12:46PM (#32739693)
Because they said so?

> "Now after all this rant: I didn't watch rings of power, and I don't plan to, why soil a good memory and good mental mythos I have of that world?"

> "I watched up till the intro credits of episode one. It seems... OK?"

> "I watched the trailer and I didn't watch the show yet, but I if it follows the trend, I imagine what I will find. I don't know if I will watch it."

> "I found the first episode very long drawn and boring. Wanted to leave a review but Amazon told me: "please watch till the end to leave a review". Not going to torture myself just to leave a review."

> "I’ve only watched one episode, but that episode was not good."

> "That begin said, I haven't watched any RoP, the "nothing" could be complete fluff because the story is too thin."

> "I don't think I'll be watching this series at all based on what I've read in the comments here."

> "zero sympathy here; Tolkien reader; not watching this media at all.. zero"

> "I don’t known about others, but I really don’t want to watch this show now."

Am I the only one that seems weird to? Like, watch it and have whatever opinion you feel! But when did not watch it and have a strong opinion become a valid option?

Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by Corrado on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @08:54AM (#32736447)
Some of the reviews were posted before the episodes were even released.
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by bowsamic on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @01:22AM (#32733184)
But a lot of the people who are freaking out clearly haven’t read the books because the stuff they say is often incorrect
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by cygx on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @03:26AM (#32734046)
Note that the canon is somewhat fluid: Tolkien changed his mind on various things (off-hand, I can think of the creation of the orcs, when the wizards first arrived in middle-earth and what exactly Balrogs look like).
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by caskstrength on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @07:27AM (#32735595)
Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi
Re:Amazon putting a three-day pause on reviews for Rings of ... by cygx on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @09:02AM (#32736524)
But 'Jupiter' has been dead for close to 50 years. While Tolkien was protective of his work and its integrity, I'm not entirely sure he would have wanted it to ossify entirely (as already quoted elsewhere: "I would draw some of the great tales in fullness, and leave many others only placed in the scheme, and sketched. The cycles should be linked to a majestic whole, and yet leave scope for other minds and hands, wielding paint and music and drama").