News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kiwi Farms response to CloudFlare by gcr on Sunday September 04, 2022 @11:25AM (#32714038)
I can demonstrate that KF is acting in bad faith: To this day Kiwifarms still hosts the Christchurch video, the same video discussed in Moon’s rebuttal here.

In 2022, Moon (the author of this HN link) posted the AU Government’s takedown order along with his response: “were a US company,” refusing to remove the CC video.

You can still find it by searching for “AU Government Class 1 Security Kiwifarms”

They clearly want to keep this content up.

Re:Kiwi Farms response to CloudFlare by pseudo0 on Sunday September 04, 2022 @12:02PM (#32714415)
Well it is a US company... In the US, you are allowed to possess or distribute photos from concentration camps, 9/11 footage, and yes, the Christchurch video. You don't need a special journalism license or a law enforcement badge. Many sites understandably choose not to host content like that, but it's important for some places to be willing to host primary source material. Otherwise the event will just fade from our collective consciousness, or will end up getting distorted or twisted into a conspiracy theory (eg. Holocaust denial, 9/11 truthers, crisis actors, etc).
Re:Kiwi Farms response to CloudFlare by lovingCranberry on Sunday September 04, 2022 @03:30PM (#32716811)
I believe this content should actually be kept up somewhere. If you burn your records, you will most likely make the same mistake twice.
Re:Kiwi Farms response to CloudFlare by yanderekko on Sunday September 04, 2022 @02:05PM (#32715826)
Explain how refusing to censor content or turn over PII on a government's behalf, something which many companies due, relates to "acting in bad faith".