News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The super-rich ‘preppers’ planning to save themselves by choko on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:29AM (#32712829)
And? How does this make their opinion more or less valid? This is a classic example of appeal to authority.
Re:The super-rich ‘preppers’ planning to save themselves by RunSet on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:33AM (#32712867)
Re:The super-rich ‘preppers’ planning to save themselves by choko on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:45AM (#32712985)
When the only argument is fallacious, you actually need to provide something non- fallacious or you are left with no argument and your premise fails, as is the case here. I find it condescending that your only reply was a link and no text. Peak intellectual laziness.
Re:The super-rich ‘preppers’ planning to save themselves by denton-scratch on Sunday September 04, 2022 @10:54AM (#32713725)
It's not an argument, and so it's not an appeal to authority, nor any other fallacious argument. It's just the blurb you see if you click on the author's byline at the head of the article.

I clicked on it, because I wanted to know who the author was.