News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by Cyberdog on Saturday September 03, 2022 @07:03PM (#32707265)
And it's a huge strawman to imply I said people just wanted SF gone for aesthetic reasons.

At any rate, if "hate the message" of SF is inappropriate, what would you suggest instead? I, and many other people, strongly disagree with the ideas that most people on SF advocate for. I think that "hate their message" works just fine there.

Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by dillondoyle on Saturday September 03, 2022 @09:08PM (#32708561)
How about stop the violence and harassment?

It's not just a message or speech. It involves IRL stocking, harassment, and violence against people they target based on hate and discrimination.

Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by Cyberdog on Saturday September 03, 2022 @10:24PM (#32709134)
It is not possible for violence to occur via the internet. And if you believe that posts on the site somehow constitutes harassment to an illegal degree, contact law enforcement.
Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by dillondoyle on Saturday September 03, 2022 @11:09PM (#32709403)
The violence is organized and facilitated via the internet. And yes law enforcement should have been more involved much quicker
Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by Cyberdog on Sunday September 04, 2022 @01:05AM (#32710022)
Now that KF is back up (good job, CF), please find me one post on KF that involves the planning of violence which wasn't either deleted or ridiculed into oblivion by the other posters there. If it's so common, this should be an easy task, right?
Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by nafey on Sunday September 04, 2022 @04:20AM (#32711003)
Why don't you see this as an example: https://twitter.com/keffals/status/1566153033586810885
Re:Blocking Kiwifarms by acali on Sunday September 04, 2022 @11:03AM (#32713820)
That post was deleted within minutes. The user was banned. Do we also need word filters to prevent the post from even appearing client side?