News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by cush on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:30PM (#32694858)
> I wish we could stop propagating the idea that it's possible to "steal someone's identity"

Identity theft is a term that comes from the fact that you can use this information to open up a bank account or become someone digitally, not because they steal your personality.

It’s a great term because exemplifies the gross negligence and liability that comes with egregious misuse of personal data

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by dec0dedab0de on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:43PM (#32694981)
There was a push a while back to call it bank fraud. Because the banks are the victims and should be responsible to protect/insure themselves.

By calling it identity theft, we are saying individuals are the victims and should protect the banks from someone pretending to be them.

Edit: I also believe there was an argument that banks reporting to credit agencies based on fraudulent activity from a 3rd party should be treated as libel.

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by jen20 on Saturday September 03, 2022 @12:11AM (#32698631)
> I also believe there was an argument that banks reporting to credit agencies based on fraudulent activity from a 3rd party should be treated as libel.

This is interesting - do you know if it has ever been tested?

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by dec0dedab0de on Sunday September 04, 2022 @01:12PM (#32715254)
I don't know, and I don't even remember where I heard it, I think it was on here but I dont know. I think maybe I was wrong about 'bank fraud' and the term being pushed was 'bank libel' instead of identity theft. Because all the negative sides of supposed 'identity theft' were from the banks saying the individual did something they did not.
Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by buildbot on Saturday September 03, 2022 @12:37AM (#32698779)
I’d donate to gofundme for the legal costs next time it comes up…
Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by cush on Friday September 02, 2022 @08:58PM (#32697487)
Every bank I deal with (3 of them) take responsibility for any claims from identity theft/bank fraud. Looks like the push worked!
Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by capableweb on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:52PM (#32695062)
If a bank allows someone to open up a bank account with personal details that don't really belong to them, I'd call that fraud and a failure on the banks side. "Stealing someone's identity" sounds like I could and should have been able to prevent that, rather than putting the blame on the bank who accepted false personal details in the first place.

As I said, those details, including address and more, are public in some countries. Those countries have learned to live that just being able to say my name, date of birth, address and telephone number is not enough to open a bank account, why can other "modern" countries not adjust accordingly too?

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by largepeepee on Friday September 02, 2022 @06:41PM (#32696524)
Rather than just banks, you can say it is also a systemic problem if the details like ssn is such an important number yet it is so easily obtained.

There is a reason why the majority of these frauds are US based

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by AstralStorm on Saturday September 03, 2022 @03:54AM (#32699723)
Unless the thief gets their hands on my ID and personal ID number (similar to social security), they're not getting there.

Now if they do that, changing in particular the latter is rather hard.

Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by synu on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:59PM (#32695117)
There’s a funny Mitchell and Webb sketch about it: https://youtu.be/CS9ptA3Ya9E
Re:Samsung Recent Security Incident by nopenopenopeno on Friday September 02, 2022 @04:49PM (#32695556)
Wonderful! I will be sharing this one a lot. Thank you.